About Superteam Ukraine

Superteam Ukraine is focused on growing the Solana ecosystem in Ukraine. We connect the best Ukrainian talent with opportunities in the Solana and Web3 ecosystem, helping them find jobs, get grants, and launch their projects.

About the Bounty

Superteam Ukraine is commissioning a student research piece exploring how modern neobanks ( led by Revolut ) have built crypto holding and transfer features directly inside a banking app, and what it would realistically take for Ukrainian neobanks to offer the same once the legal framework allows it.

This is not a critique of Ukrainian banks. It is a practical deep dive into the mechanics, economics, and strategy behind in-app crypto banking ( using Revolut as the clearest working example ) and a forward-looking analysis of how Ukrainian players could move quickly when the regulatory starting gun fires.

The piece should be accessible, well-sourced, and genuinely useful for students, fintech professionals, and anyone curious about where Ukrainian banking is heading.

🎓 Eligibility

This bounty is open exclusively to students of Kyiv National Economic University (KNEU) and Borys Hrinchenko Kyiv University

Scope (What to Cover)

1. How Revolut handles crypto — under the hood

• What mechanisms does Revolut use to store crypto on behalf of users? (Custodial model, omnibus wallets, third-party custodians)

• How does crypto transfer between Revolut users work: is it on-chain or internal ledger movement?

• How is this fundamentally different from a crypto exchange (like Binance) or a DeFi protocol?

• What happens to a user's crypto if their Revolut account is frozen or blocked: how fast is access restored, are fees charged, can assets be withdrawn?

• What limits do users face: purchase limits, withdrawal limits, supported assets, geographic restrictions?

2. The business case — is crypto profitable for a neobank?

• Revenue model: how does Revolut earn on crypto? (Spread fees, exchange markup, subscription upsell, staking revenue)

• What are the additional costs of offering crypto: custody infrastructure, compliance overhead, licensing, insurance?

• Has crypto been a net positive for Revolut's growth? Cite available data from Revolut's annual reports or public filings

• How many users chose Revolut because of crypto features, and how many started using crypto because Revolut made it easy? (acquisition vs. activation angle)

3. GTM strategy — how Revolut onboarded crypto users

• What marketing and product strategies did Revolut use to introduce crypto to mainstream banking users?

• Key campaigns, partnerships, referral mechanics, and in-app nudges that drove crypto adoption

• How did Revolut position crypto: as investment, as spending tool, or as both?

• Lessons other neobanks could apply from Revolut's crypto onboarding playbook

4. Legal landscape — why Ukrainian neobanks can't do this yet

• What specific legal limitations prevent Ukrainian banks from offering crypto holding today?

• Key regulatory blockers: NBU position, LUVA (Law on Virtual Assets) implementation status, wartime capital controls

• Side-by-side comparison: what licenses and regulatory approvals does Revolut hold (FCA, Lithuanian EMI, MiCA readiness) vs. what currently exists in Ukraine?

• What would need to change in Ukrainian law, specifically for a neobank to legally offer the same features?

5. The readiness question — how fast could Ukrainian neobanks move?

• If Ukrainian crypto law were aligned with EU standards tomorrow, what would a neobank need to launch crypto features within 6–12 months?

• Technical requirements: custody partner, wallet infrastructure, on/off-ramp integrations, compliance tooling

• Operational requirements: staff, AML/KYC processes, customer support for crypto edge cases

• What could slow them down even after the law changes: legacy core banking systems, talent gaps, risk appetite?

• On the example of a Ukrainian neobank (Sense Bank, monobank, or similar): what is their current public attitude toward crypto? Have any representatives commented on readiness or future plans? (Direct interviews with bank representatives will be considered a strong advantage in evaluation)

Deliverables

Main article (1,800–2,500 words):

• Executive summary (120–180 words)

• 2–3 original charts or tables — suggested:

  1. Revolut crypto feature breakdown vs. typical exchange vs. DeFi — what users can and can't do

  2. Cost/revenue breakdown of crypto operations for a neobank (estimated model)

  3. Ukrainian neobank readiness checklist: what exists today, what's missing

• "What This Means for Ukraine" section with 5–7 clear, actionable takeaways for students, founders, and bank operators

• 10+ credible citations (Revolut annual reports, NBU documents, Ukrainian legislation, reputable fintech and crypto media)

Twitter/X thread (8–12 tweets):

• Summarizes the key findings in plain language

• Must tag @SuperteamUKR

• Should be punchy and shareable: written for a general audience, not just specialists

KPIs

• Depth: Revolut mechanics explained clearly enough for a non-technical reader

• Rigor: 10+ credible, verifiable sources; no unverified claims

• Ukraine relevance: Concrete analysis of local banks and regulatory context, not just a Revolut profile

• Accessibility: Written so a second-year economics student can follow it without a crypto background

• Visibility: X thread published and tagging @SuperteamUKR

Evaluation Rubric (100 pts)

Criteria

Depth of research & originality - 30%

Ukraine specificity & practical relevance - 25%

Quality of data, visuals & structure - 20%

Writing clarity & accessibility - 15%

Distribution & social engagement - 10%

Timeline

3 weeks from bounty publication

Submission

• Link to Google Doc or Notion (comment access enabled), with all charts included or linked

• Link to published X thread tagging @SuperteamUKR

Notes

• Original work only; cite every factual claim

• Tone: clear, professional, and accessible, write for smart people who are not crypto experts

• Interviews or quotes from representatives of Ukrainian neobanks or fintech companies will be weighted highly in scoring

• AI-assisted research is permitted; AI-generated text submitted without editing or original thought is not